giovanni56 0 Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Per chi vuole provare alternative al tweeter Ar3a o Improved, con uno Scanspeak D2010 o uno Scanspeak D2008. Suono spettacolare, il tweeter deve essere assolutamente invertito di fase rispetto a mid e woofer, va eliminato il potenziometro di livello, la R piu 'adatta per un buon bilanciamento secondo me e' la 4.7 ohm, ma per chi vuole di più luminosità dei 3.3 ohm, e per chi ha ambienti poco assorbenti la R 5.6 ohm. È una necessaria flangia adattatore tra il foro del cabinet, che ha un diametro maggiore del tweeter, per mantenere il tweeter a filo con il pannello anteriore dell'altoparlante, e un condensatore in polipropilene da 1,5 uF (non costoso), ad esempio , un Jantzen o Audyn Cap Quote Link to post Share on other sites
genek 0 Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 (Auto translation) For those who want to try alternatives to the Ar3a or Improved tweeter, with a Scanspeak D2010 or a Scanspeak D2008. Spectacular sound, the tweeter must be absolutely inverted phase with respect to the mid and woofer, the level potentiometer must be eliminated, the R most suitable for a good balance in my opinion is the 4.7 ohm, but for those who want more brightness than 3.3 ohm, and for those with poorly absorbing environments the R 5.6 ohm. It is a necessary adapter flange between the hole in the cabinet, which has a larger diameter than the tweeter, to keep the tweeter flush with the front panel of the speaker, and a 1.5uF polypropylene capacitor (inexpensive), for example , a Jantzen or Audyn Cap Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ligs 0 Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 That is good to know. I tried Dynaudio D21(3/4" dome with a semi horn) before in AR3a. The treble sounded too prominent. Now I know why. George Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.