Jump to content

Large Advent Woofer (Masonite 1972) Measured Thiel and Small Parameters


Pete B

Recommended Posts

Just did a quick run of an original, never reconed, Large Advent woofer (masonite). woofer is not stamped with a date but other parts say 1972 in the system. I refoamed this woofer with an RSSOUND edge which was a perfect fit:

Measured voice coil DCR (Re) with a Fluke meter at 4.83 ohms.

Piston diameter measured (estimated) at 20 cm = 7.87"

Used Liberty Audio Suite (LAUD) added mass method, delta mass = 52 grams for -33% delta f.

Midband (80 Hz) test voltage was about .5 Vrms.

Woofer had been used (broken in if you believe in such things) with music before testing:

Fs = 18.23 Hz

Vas = 250 liters or 8.82 cu ft

Re = 4.83

Qe = .364

Qm = 2.93

Qts = .324

Mms = 42.28g

Cms = 1.80 mm/N

Bl = 8.02 Tm

no = .400 %

SPLref = 88 dB

These figures pass a sanity check from my perspective.

Pete B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Pete,

Have you done the specs on the Tonegen replacements for the 12" AR woofer?

Bret still has a pair to sell and I have been toying with the idea of building a 'modern' pair of ar11/ar58's....

Would I just copy the volume of the AR98 for optimom low end response? I would use the 'original' replacement tweeter and midrange that Layne Audio sells. Or [possibly an AR90 style speaker but using two Advent woofers which I can probably get cheaper than 4 AR's by buying complete Advents....

Any suggestions based on your reference speaker project?...

regards, Wally

>Just did a quick run of an original, never reconed, Large

>Advent woofer (masonite). woofer is not stamped with a date

>but other parts say 1972 in the system. I refoamed this

>woofer with an RSSOUND edge which was a perfect fit:

>

>Measured voice coil DCR (Re) with a Fluke meter at 4.83 ohms.

>Piston diameter measured (estimated) at 20 cm = 7.87"

>Used Liberty Audio Suite (LAUD) added mass method, delta mass

>= 52 grams for -33% delta f.

>Midband (80 Hz) test voltage was about .5 Vrms.

>Woofer had been used (broken in if you believe in such things)

>with music before testing:

>

>Fs = 18.23 Hz

>Vas = 250 liters or 8.82 cu ft

>Re = 4.83

>Qe = .364

>Qm = 2.93

>Qts = .324

>Mms = 42.28g

>Cms = 1.80 mm/N

>Bl = 8.02 Tm

>no = .400 %

>SPLref = 88 dB

>

>These figures pass a sanity check from my perspective.

>

>Pete B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...