Guest Kokopelli Posted November 27, 2005 Report Share Posted November 27, 2005 Hi,New poster here. Due to some sad circumstances, I recently obtained a pair of AR-1's and separate tweeters. I'm no expert, but I have learned a bit about the AR-1's from google. I can't find much information on the tweeters, however. Does anyone have any info or references? I'd really appreciate it. I've attached some photos here:http://www.classicspeakerpages.net/dc/user_files/728.jpghttp://www.classicspeakerpages.net/dc/user_files/729.jpghttp://www.classicspeakerpages.net/dc/user_files/730.jpghttp://www.classicspeakerpages.net/dc/user_files/731.jpgI'll state upfront that I'm probably going to sell them; I'm not a collector, just a musician. They're very cool looking though, I'm glad I got to check them out.Anyway, thanks for any information or references. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tysontom Posted November 27, 2005 Report Share Posted November 27, 2005 >Hi,>>New poster here. Due to some sad circumstances, I recently>obtained a pair of AR-1's and separate tweeters. I'm no>expert, but I have learned a bit about the AR-1's from google.> I can't find much information on the tweeters, however. Does>anyone have any info or references? I'd really appreciate it.> I've attached some photos here:>>>I'll state upfront that I'm probably going to sell them; I'm>not a collector, just a musician. They're very cool looking>though, I'm glad I got to check them out.>>Anyway, thanks for any information or references.The tweeters in your pictures are the University Sound "Sphericon" dome tweeters, a development from LTV University in the early 1960s. The dome was a phenolic material, much like the horn-tweeter diaphrams that were made by University for many years dating back to the 1940s. The Sphericon was actually an excellent-performing tweeter with extended response, and a test published in the AES Journal in the 1960s showed that it was second only to the AR-3 1-3/8-inch super tweeter that was also tested. These tweeters far outpaced the other tweeters in the AES report. To the amazement of the tester, the AR-3 super tweeter essentially duplicated the microphone calibration curve, but the Sphericon was not too far behind. The tweeter had a dispersing ring in front of the dome that helped with off-axis response.http://www.classicspeakerpages.net/dc/user_files/732.jpgImage of the "naked" University Sound Sphericon Dome Tweeter from the University Classic Mark IIThe stand-alone Sphericon tweeters shown in your pictures also had a built-in crossover network designed to be used with existing systems, and the x-over frequency was somewhere around 5 kHz. This combination worked fairly well with the AR-1. It is interesting that most AR-1s that show up these days came from an estate somewhere, or an "inheritance" of sorts. Usually the recepients "cash-out" on them on eBay, but the value is increasing, so you might want to reconsider selling them right away.--Tom Tyson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ar_pro Posted November 27, 2005 Report Share Posted November 27, 2005 It's really a shame, but these fine speakers will most likely be gutted in Asia for their Altec drivers.They are probably 100% operational, and ready-to-play; unlike the later-era systems with foam surrounds, which would require the removal of the grilles to repair the woofers and (almost definitely) clean/repair the level controls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kokopelli Posted November 27, 2005 Report Share Posted November 27, 2005 Thanks for the help and info. It does seem sad if they get torn apart; they're in good shape as far as I can tell. I haven't gotten to try them out myself, but I'm pretty sure they're ready to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.