Jump to content

crumpets

Members
  • Posts

    49
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    Australia

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

crumpets's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Week One Done Rare

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. Thanks Roy, that makes a lot of sense. I did "test" the pots before I took the speakers apart, but obviously not very thoroughly. I will take them out and see if I can clean them up. I have a few pots in varying conditions, so I should be able to get 2 more in shape. I'm trying to avoid replacing them with Lpads at this stage, but have some on standby, just in case. I am replacing the tweeters with HiVi's. I've included the 6uf cap in series and the 0.05 coil. Roy, I have a couple of pairs of tweeters that I would like to have rebuilt. I have a pair of 200011's and a pair of 200013-2's from my AR5's that were replaced with HiVi. Are you still doing this type of work?
  2. One other thing, regarding the midrange drivers...The image of the speakers at the top of this thread shows one speaker has the A.11 midrange driver(from the guide), whilst the other is a replacement A.13. I have two A.13 midrange drivers in a pair of AR3a Improved. I'd rather do the best I can to get these AR3a's I'm working on sounding good, so I don't mind sacrificing the Improved. Would it be better if I put matching A.13 drivers into these speakers, or isn't it even an issue having one A.11 and one A.13?
  3. Just reviving an old thread as I continue the restoration of these AR3a's. I removed the pots from one speaker to try to resurrect them, so I'm now trying to wire them back in using the other speaker as a guide. The question I have is regarding the orange wire going from 1 to B on the midrange pot. I can't see it in the AR3a guide, but I do struggle with schematics. I don't recall it being on the crossover I have already dissected, but maybe it has something to do with a replacement driver that one speaker has. Should it be there? If so, can I just use any gauge wire?
  4. Thanks ReliaBill, not sure if I'd trust myself getting a suitable product. Will probably go for the tried and tested.
  5. Ok, good one. Has anyone had success with any alternatives to the cloth surround sealing product offered by vintage_ar on the bay, or is this still considered the best option? Being an ar enthusiast in the southern hemisphere sure has its disadvantages, and postage is one!
  6. Thanks for the visuals. Very helpful. Does sealing the cloth surround on those woofers have an effect on the performance, or is it more to keep them from cracking/further deteriorating?
  7. Good pickup genek. I peeled back the sticker and it looks like 200011 - ?. Going by the ar3 resto doc, that would put them at 4ohm and 1975 I think. I tried to measure them. I'm not exactly sure if I'm doing it correctly, but got a measurement of 3.5 for one and 3.2 for the other. When I measure the new hivi tweeters I get about 5. Just to throw another element into the picture. I also have a pair of 200013-2 tweeters that I took out of the ar5's and replaced with hivi, because one was not working. The working one measures 5.9, the other fails to get a reading. Maybe, if @RoyC is up for it, I could send both the 200011's and the 200013-2's on an overseas trip for a bit of tlc. I do have a very rugged pair of ar3a's that are in the early stages of restoration. They came with some dodgy tweeters and I was intending on going the hivi route with them also. If I could install original tweeters, that would be amazing.
  8. Here is a photo of the tweeter. 1200013-2. It came as it is. I have only recapped and replaced the pots. I'll try and test the resistance tomorrow. JKent, I would have had the tweeters from the AR5's repaired, but I'm in Australia, so not sure if it's too costly an exercise. I'm happy with the result with the hivi's in them. Yes, the surrounds will be replaced. Not a great job at all. I'm not worried about the look of the larger dustcaps, so I'm still thinking I'll go with the glue. Sorry for the quick reply, but it's very late here
  9. Porous! That's the word I was looking for. Ok, thanks. I think sealing with glue might be the way to go. Very neat work btw. I wonder why the porous dustcaps were used. Mind you, even with the porous dustcap, the performance was better than the speaker with the 1210040-2A. The other cabinet wasn't that well sealed though, so probably an unfair comparison. After sealing the dustcaps and making sure the cabinets are sealed, I'll have to make a decision about whether to replace the tweeters with hivi's. They made a huge difference to my previously restored AR5's, so I guess it's the way to go with these as well.
  10. Hi everyone, I was given a pair of 2ax speakers a month or so ago. They had issues with the pots, so I replaced them and recapped with Dayton caps. They sound ok. At least all drivers are working. But, the main issue, from what I can tell, is the woofers. They appear to be the late 2ax 4hole woofers which have had the surrounds and dustcaps replaced. The surround job looks a bit rough, but it is the dustcaps that have me puzzled. They are a very fine mesh and appear to be larger than those on pics I've seen of the same drivers. The closeup shows you can see right through them. I imagine they should be sealed dustcaps for this model. Is that correct? Also, would the larger dustcaps be an indication the woofers have been modified? I have a pair of 1210040-2A woofers that I could put in them, but from what I gather these wouldn't be the best option. I'm thinking of removing the dustcaps from the correct drivers and replacing them with sealed ones. I'm pretty nervous about doing it without damaging them though. Pictures show the woofers in question and the 2ax's sporting the two different woofers. Any suggestions would be welcome.
  11. Oh, i got that ar3 mid image from google. Comes from this thread
  12. Thanks fellas. Yes, the cabs look like black felt and not great. I'm thinking you may bee right JKent, A.11 mid that is now backwired. That is my main concern really. I can't listen to themand I'm just worried that mid may be an ar5 mid that had been thrown in at some stage. I guess it's unlikely, but it's be nice to be sure. Would almost certainly need hivi tweeters to get anything close to original sounding.
  13. Hi all, just wondering if anyone might have a chance to comment on whether these mids and woofers look like what I think they are before I throw my hard earned at these speakers. From what I can tell, the mid on the left looks to be the most common 3a mid(70-76). Not sure if the mid on the right is an ar3a or an ar5 mid. Any opinions would be appreciated. Also, do the woofers appear to be ones with alnico drivers? And, would they originally have had cloth surrounds? I have used the hivi tweeters before in my ar5's, so would look at doing this again if the tweeters didn't stack up. Appreciate any thoughts.
  14. Thanks for the tips. Re. the 440ml, do you know if the vm540, which has replaced it still do as good a job? The Ortofon 2M red is about a third the price of the AT over here. Maybe that's the best option. Do you think I'd notice a significant improvement over my current AT95E?
  15. Yes, great track, eh! I walked into the local charity shop just after someone dropped off a stack of vinyl including that album. Good day. Thanks for the feedback. I'm very happy with the 5's post resto and now with the correct woofers.
×
×
  • Create New...